Archive for June, 2009

Idekit-prototype

Using seven recycled shipping containers, architect Bernard Morin and wife Joyce Labelle built this contemporary residence in St. Adele, Quebec.  The home is the first of many to come for their new company, Maison Idekit, which will help homeowners turn containers into architecturally unique, and inexpensive, homes.  The company has two more residential projects set to break ground in the next couple months using a total of twelve container modules.

IMG_3912

IDEKIT’s first home is 3,000 square feet with four-bedrooms.  It cost about $175,000 (R1.5m) to build and turns container design on its head.  Rather than feature the exposed containers on the exterior, the containers are exposed on the inside — you can even see serial numbers, dents, and corrugated detail in several places throughout the home.  On the outside, the home has five inches of insulation that is topped by brown wood siding.

Maison a part-entry

Idekit-kitchen

Exposed-interior

Idekit-stairs

Photo credits: Maison IDEKIT.

Source : Jetson Green

Keep it Green

Greencon

Hey Will,

Got got my elect bill!

June last year – consumed 4139 KWH at a cost of R51c each = R2110.89  (at 55c = R2276.45)

Greencon

This June consumed 2316 KWH at a cost of 55c each = R1273.80

That’s a saving of R1002.65

My solar geyser has now been in for 12 months – saving on electricity is R4300 or 36%

With electricity going up by 30% + my savings will increase  to around R5500 next year.

Very happy with a 3.5 year pay back.

Cheers

Dave Myers

Cell: (censored)

Associated Press

By SUSAN SAULNY

Published: June 24, 2009

CHICAGO — The Sears Tower, that bronze-black monument that forms the 110-story peak of the skyline here and stands as the tallest office building in the Western Hemisphere, will soon have another unique feature: wind turbines sprouting from its recessed rooftops high in the sky.

The building’s owners, leasing agents and architects said Wednesday that they are literally taking environmental sustainability to new heights with a $350 million retrofit of the 1970s-era modernist building — and the turbines are only the tip of the transformation. The plan, to begin immediately, aims to reduce electricity use in the tower by 80 percent over five years through upgrades in the glass exterior, internal lighting, heating, cooling and elevator systems — and its own green power generation.

In such a huge tower, with 4.5 million square feet of office and retail space, 16,000 windows and 104 elevators, the project is bound to be one of the most substantial green renovations ever tried on one site, planners said. The Sears Tower is significantly larger than the 102-story, 2.6-million-square-foot Empire State Building, for instance, which is also undergoing renovation to reduce energy consumption.

“If we can take care of one building that size, it has a huge impact on society,” said Adrian Smith, an architect whose firm designed the Sears Tower renovation. “It is a village in and of itself.”

Buildings are among the world’s largest contributors of greenhouse gas emissions. After the retrofit, energy savings at the Sears Tower, which is to be renamed the Willis Tower this summer, would be equal to 150,000 barrels of oil a year, officials said. The savings are expected to help redeem some of the project’s cost, which is to be financed through private equity investment, grants, debt financing and government funds.

The Sears Tower plans to open a first-floor center to educate the public about the redesign, and hopes to serve as a model for other aging skyscrapers around the world, officials said.

Keep it Green

Greencon

Rimrock-ranch

The July/August issue of Dwell brings us this beautiful desert home in Pioneertown, California (not too far from Three Junipers, actually).  The home was designed by architect Lloyd Russell for Jim Austin, an entrepreneur who wanted something simple.  The functional home of 1,600 square feet is what Austin calls, “the ultimate desert structure.”  It’s built with recycled and durable materials, as well as a prominent steel canopy that shelters and shades the home.

Austin-home-canopy-illustration

In the desert, there’s wind and sun, and the canopy is an obvious solution to use both elements to keep the temperature down inside the house.  When the sun hits the canopy, some of that heat is reflected back into the sky while the rest is absorbed by the canopy.  And since there’s a wind buffer, the design creates a cooling mechanism to keep the house relatively shaded and cool.

Jim Austin’s home sits on a ten-acre parcel of land called Rimrock Ranch.  With a modest combination of windows, weathered steel, and concrete, it seems to suit the desert perfectly.  The roll up garage-style door is a nice touch, too.  These are showing up all over the place (see Logical Homes and Buzz Lofts).

[+] Operation Desert Shed by Dwell.

Rimrock-ranch-kitchen

Rimrock-ranch-house

Rimrock-canopy

Photo credits: David Harrison; illustration: Dwell.

Source: Jetson Green

Keep it Green

Greencon

It’s true that structures that incorporate “green” design elements are inherently inventive, since they often utilize state-of-the-art technologies in order to have minimum impact on the environment. However, there are some buildings that go above and beyond even green conventions in order to meet Gold- or even Platinum-level LEED (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) building certification standards. From a water facility with a 30,000-square-foot green roof to a nonprofit center with a 42-gallon water tank that stores rainwater for reuse, these eight award-winning architectural superstars are truly green trailblazers.

Gish Family Apartments in San Jose, California

This 35-unit energy-efficient housing complex is LEED Gold-certified for homes and new construction. Built on an urban brownfield (a vacant property that may require additional cleanup due to possible contamination by hazardous substances) and located near public transportation, the complex obtained 20% of its materials from within 500 miles of the structure, and 90% of the construction waste was later recycled. The building has a rooftop photovoltaic array—which harvests photons from the sun to convert into electricity—that offsets 30% of the energy costs. The apartment complex also uses 62% less potable water due to the installation of minimal-flow sinks, showers and toilets. Photo courtesy of Bernard Andre Photography and First Community Housing

The Animal Foundation’s Dog Adoption Park in Las Vegas, Nevada

Rather than adhere to the standard layout, a large room filled with individual dog kennels, The Animal Foundation opted for this adoption park filled with 22 identical “bungalows” that each house 10 to 12 dogs. Built according to LEED Platinum requirements, this complex uses the region’s ample wind and sun resources to its benefit; mounted solar panels provide shade while generating 25% of the daily required energy, and outside air is cooled by indirect evaporative coolers before being circulated throughout the rooms. The park uses a “living machine” to treat waste water that is then reused on site, thus reducing water needs by 50%. Overall, the animal shelter uses 81% less energy than comparable structures. Photo courtesy of Tate Snyder Kimsey
Western Center for Archaeology & Paleontology in Hemet, California

Designated as the first Platinum LEED museum in the United States, this building is connected to the virtually identical Center for Water Education via a pedestrian walkway. The 70,000-square-foot twin-building complex is located on the Diamond Lake Reservoir, and fossils found during the reservoir’s creation are housed within the Western Center. The buildings utilize photovoltaic panels, which provide almost 50% of the structures’ energy needs, and heat-blocking glass, to keep out the arid region’s intense sun while allowing in natural light to minimize use of electric lights. Outdoors, a drip-irrigation system uses reclaimed water to nourish native and drought-tolerant plants. Photo courtesy of James Horecka, AIA, Architect
Heifer International in Little Rock, Arkansas

The headquarters for this nonprofit, which is dedicated to ending world hunger, is located on 22 acres of land that was once 60% covered by paving (which was crushed and reused during the construction process). The brownfield—and former railroad switching yard—now has restored wetlands partly surrounding this green structure. The building uses 55% less energy than a conventional one, and a five-story-tall, 42,000-gallon water tank collects rainwater used for toilets and cooling systems. The steel, timber and aluminum used were all locally sourced, and recycled denim is used for the insulation. Photo courtesy of Heifer International

Philip Merrill Environmental Center in Annapolis, Maryland

For environmental advocacy group the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, it was important that its headquarters be as eco-friendly as its causes. This structure uses 90% less water than a conventional office building by utilizing composting toilets and capturing rainwater to reuse. Geothermal walls keep the interior warm in the winter and cool in the summer, solar panels heat water used indoors, and a “total energy management system” monitors energy usage and daylight levels and alerts employees when windows are open—all contributing to the center’s designation as the first building to ever receive a LEED Platinum rating.Photo courtesy of Andreas Kollegger via Flickr.com
Pocono Environmental Education Center in Dingmans Ferry, Pennsylvania

The goal for this building was to create a hands-on classroom experience that promotes the group’s mission to raise environmental awareness. To that end, many of the structure’s elements were intended to be teaching tools. For instance, tires found in the surrounding rivers and park grounds were recycled and used to build the structure’s north wall, showcasing how items can be reused for new purposes. Located within a native forest, the site for this center was chosen because the area had already been cleared by a previous owner and construction would have no adverse effect on local ecosystems.Photo courtesy of Bohlin Cywinski Jackson and Pocono Environmental Education Center

The Molecular Foundry in Berkeley, California

This nanotechnology research laboratory had major hurdles to overcome to achieve a LEED Gold rating, since it housed areas such as wet and dry labs, sterile cleanrooms and a server room, which traditionally demand a large amount of energy. Once completed, the structure ended up using 28% less energy than required by the extremely stringent California building efficiency standard. Almost all wood used was sustainably harvested, and 85% of construction waste was recycled. Photo courtesy of Roy Kaltschmidt

Whitney Water Purification Facility in New Haven, Connecticut

This 360-foot-long steel building, which was designed to look like an inverted water droplet, provides water to southern Connecticut and includes an educational center. The 30,000-square-foot green roof contains 900 pounds of grass clippings and 7,000 perennial flowers—making it the largest green roof in the state. No natural habitats were affected by its construction, and the surrounding wetlands, which are home to migrating birds, were actually enlarged during the construction process. Photo courtesy of Chris McVoy and Steven Holl Architects

Source: Womans Day On-line

Keep it Green

Greencon


Nuclear power plants may not emit greenhouse gases, but they sure could suck in the tax dollars.

An analysis by economist Mark Cooper at the Vermont Law School claims that adding 100 new reactors to the U.S. power grid would cost taxpayers and customers between $1.9 and $4.1 trillion over the reactors’ lifetimes compared with renewable power sources and conservation measures.

The analysis factors in studies from Wall Street and independent energy analysts estimating the efficiency of renewable energy at 6 cents per kilowatt hour versus 12 to 20 cents per kilowatt hour for nuclear.  Cooper says those costs will fall on either ratepayers through higher electric bills or on taxpayers through large subsidies.

“It is telling that in the few short years since the so-called ‘Nuclear Renaissance’ began there has been a four-fold increase in projected costs,” Cooper said in a statement. “The original low-ball estimates were promotional, not practical; they were based on hope and hype intended to promote the industry.”

Cooper’s study comes on the heels of a recent review of the state of nuclear power by a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  The researchers concluded that nuclear power was not the most cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gases and that waste management and safety issues must be addressed for it to remain a viable option.  In 2003, the MIT team expressed similar skepticism in a report co-authored by John Holdren, now President Obama’s science advisor.

Indeed, any new nuclear plants are a long way from fruition. Although 17 applications for 26 new reactors have been filed with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, not one is under construction.

Source: Scientific American

Keep it Green

Greencon

It is no longer enough to just conserve energy. More and more corporations, government agencies and entire cities are making large, long-term commitments to ensure that the power they do use comes from renewable sources. To recognize these trendsetters, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publishes a quarterly list of the top American users of green power: organizations that generate their own renewable energy, buy it from suppliers, or purchase offset credits to compensate for their traditional energy use. To put things in perspective, the average U.S. home consumes about 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity a year. That means number 25 on the list buys enough green energy to power more than 14,000 homes.

The most direct method to make energy consumption more sustainable is for a user to generate its own power by, for example, installing solar panels or by burning waste gas. A major do-it-yourself project, however, might not fall within the expertise of, say, a clothing retailer, so some entities hire outside operators to do it for them.

A second path is to purchase power directly from alternative energy producers, such as a nearby wind farm. The third and most common route is buying credits to offset the amount of conventional energy an organization is using. The bulk of these trades is orchestrated by brokers such as 3Degrees and Sterling Planet, which make a commission. For example, buyers can request 300 million kWh of wind power from Texas. Once energy enters the grid, it cannot be isolated, so even the biggest buyers aren’t literally powering their air conditioners with breeze-buffeted turbines. But offsets are like certified environmental karma: what comes around in the end is cleaner power production.

1. Intel
Santa Clara, CA | Information Technology
1,301 million green kWh, 46% of total power used

Buying the most renewable energy in the country is actually an honor Intel could do without, according to Will Swope, vice president of Intel’s corporate sustainability group. The company’s massive purchase is not just to stay ahead of the curve, he says, but “to give confidence to people who are creating sustainable energy.” Meaning that with increased green power supply, costs will go down for everyone—Intel included. The computer chipmaker buys the eco-sound electricity through offset credits, which pay for greener energy to enter the grid even though Intel can’t isolate it for use directly. The credits can be expensive, but Swope notes that shareholders have been behind the program. “Economics have shown,” he says, “that companies that maintain a more sustainable footprint have done better—even in economic meltdown—than those that don’t.”

Greencon

2. PepsiCo
Purchase, NY | Food & Beverage
1,145 million green kWh, 100% of total power used

The conglomerate, which is separate from the Pepsi bottling groups, made a splash when its headquarters went all green with its power buys in early 2007. PepsiCo drinks in $39 billion in net revenues through brands from Aquafina to Quaker Oats; it has turned to renewable power brokers to purchase offset credits.

Greencon

3. Kohl’s Department Stores
Menomonee Falls, WI | Retail
601 million green kWh, 50% of total power used
This chain is already the biggest solar electricity host in the U.S. To soak up rays on 60 (and counting) store and corporate rooftops, the retailer has partnered with Sun-Edison, which owns and maintains the solar panels and sells the electricity to Kohl’s. The largest setup is the roof of a distribution center in San Bernardino, Calif., where 6,208 panels can crank out a full megawatt of power.

Greencon

4. Dell
Round Rock, TX | Information Technology
554 million green kWh, 158% of total power used
In August 2008 managers declared Dell’s headquarters “carbon-neutral” after buying energy credits, increasing efficiency and reducing emissions. As a result, the company reported saving $3 million, disproving skeptical claims that running on green technology is bad for staying in the black. To compensate for overseas operations, Dell buys more U.S. offset credits than it needs at home; hence the 158 percent figure.

Greencon

5. Whole Foods Market
Austin, TX | Retail
527 million green kWh, 100% of total power used
Since December 2005 Whole Foods Market has entirely offset conventional power consumption at its stores nationwide. At that time, its buy was the biggest renewable energy purchase ever in North America. Employees at the regional or store level determine what kinds of energy to purchase (or generate) for the most locally sound decisions.

Greencon

6. Pepsi Bottling Group
Somers, NY| Food & Beverage
470 million green kWh, 100% of total power used
As the largest bottler and distributor of Pepsi products, the group jumped headlong into running fully on green energy just months after PepsiCo did (#2 above). The group, which sells more than 1.7 billion cases of drinks annually, offsets all its U.S. power use through credits.

Greencon

7. Johnson & Johnson
New Brunswick, NJ | Health Care
435 million green kWh, 38% of total power used
Johnson & Johnson began setting sustainability goals in 1990. These days, to meet more than a third of its U.S. power consumption, the company plays the full trifecta: on-site generation, energy purchases and offset credits. It generates power from landfill gas and solar panels, purchases both wind and hydropower directly, and buys offset credits for biomass and wind power.

Greencon

8. U.S. Air Force
Various bases | Government
426 million green kWh, 5% of total power used
The air force’s program started with Edwards Air Force Base in California about 10 years ago. Engineers there “were doing renewable energy before there were renewable goals,” says Jim Snook, renewable energy program manager. Since then, bases around the country have started finding ways to buy and generate renewable energy “simply because it was the right thing to do,” Snook says. About 50 bases are onboard, he estimates, and about half of those are doing on-site generation. Wind turbines at F. E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming can sweep up about 3.3 megawatts of power, and just outside of Las Vegas at Nellis Air Force Base, solar panels can produce 30 million kWh a year, which the air force asserts is the largest solar energy installation in the Western Hemisphere.

Greencon

9. Cisco Systems
San Jose, CA | Information Technology
401 million green kWh, 46% of total power used
By switching nearly half its operations to renewable energy, Cisco has eliminated the carbon emissions equal to those of more than 31 million gallons of burned gasoline. That is the equivalent of removing 335,000 car trips (at 30 miles per gallon) between New York City and Los Angeles.

Greencon

10. City of Houston
Texas| Government
350 million green kWh, 27% of total power used
Look out Chicago, Houston might be on its way to stealing the Windy City moniker—and not because of the politicians or the climate. The city’s government is now running on 27 percent fixed-rate wind power. Although that is less than a third of its total demand, Houston’s sizable purchase makes it the largest city or state buyer in the country.

Source: Scientific American Online

Keep it Green

Greencon

Greencon Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are first and second on a list of 100 wealthy individuals who have made hefty investments in clean technology or environmental causes. The Times of London news organization, which examined dossiers of the world’s richest people, says the 100 tycoons on its Green List are together worth $375 billion.

According to the Times, Buffett, who runs the Berkshire Hathaway investment firm, has poured $230 million into BYD, a Hong Kong company that makes batteries for electric cars. He also holds a major stake in MidAmerican Energy, a large wind energy utility. Gates has invested in several renewable fuels companies, including Pacific Ethanol and Sapphire Energy; the latter intends to produce gasoline from algae.

Americans hold 35 of the 100 spots. Another 17 are from China, 10 are British and seven are German. The top 10 individuals are listed here; the rest can be found at www.timesonline.co.uk/richlist.

  1. Warren Buffett (U.S.; car batteries, wind)
  2. Bill Gates (U.S.; biofuels)
  3. Ingvar Kamprad (Sweden; waste-to-energy, geothermal)Greencon
  4. Marcel Brenninkmeijer (the Netherlands; wind, hydro, solar)
  5. Mukesh Ambani (India; biofuel crops)
  6. Michael Bloomberg (U.S.; efficient cities)
  7. Michael Otto (Germany; green products)
  8. Paul Allen (U.S.; biodiesel, geothermal)
  9. Donald Bren (U.S.; environmental science)
  10. Sergey Brin (U.S.; electric cars, renewable energy)

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, “Top 100 Eco-Barons.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

If we are ever going to have a chance at combating climate change, this is a sample of the scale that will be neccesssary to achieve that outcome.

Greencon

Bonus: World’s Largest Landfill Gas Recuperation PlantPuente Hills in Whittier, Calif.

Producing power from the gas that seeps out of landfills is a better alternative than simply flaring it. (Though it’s debatable whether or not landfill gas constitutes a renewable resource, because yields of combustible gas from landfills decline between 2 and 15 percent per year after a landfill is capped and no more garbage is being added, according to Jeff Pierce, vice president of power plant development company SCS energy). Landfill gas is about half methane and half carbon dioxide and also contains water vapor, which makes it more difficult to handle than conventional natural gas.

The world’s largest landfill gas plant sits atop the Puente Hills landfill—the largest in the U.S.—which accepts trash from Los Angeles County. Pierce says that because this active landfill is still growing, production at the 20 year old Puente Hills landfill gas plant has not yet peaked, and averages about 50 megawatts.

Another 50-megawatt landfill gas plant sits atop another gigantic dump in Incheon, South Korea. Currently there are no plans for units larger than either the Puente Hills or Incheon facilities.

Greencon

1. World’s Largest Hydroelectric DamChina’s Three Gorges Dam

On December 18, 2007, the electricity production capacity of China’s Three Gorges Dam reached 14.1 gigawatts, surpassing for the first time the 14-gigawatt generating capacity of the Itaipu Dam on the border of Brazil and Paraguay, making it the largest and most productive dam in the world. By 2011, it will produce 18 gigawatts of electricity, or as much as 18 large nuclear power plants. Just one of the dam’s main generators can produce 700 megawatts of electricity. It s construction cost $26 billion.

A still-larger dam, the Grand Inga Dam, has been proposed for completion between 2020 and 2025 in the Democratic Republic of Congo on the Congo River: Its output could reach 39 gigawatts of power.

Greencon

2. World’s Largest Wave Power Plant: Aguçadoura Wave Farm near Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal

The world’s first and only commercial wave power plant resembles a 500-foot- (150 meter-) long, 11 foot- (3.5 meter-) wide snake that floats, half-submerged, on the sea surface. Each unit is anchored perpendicular to the beach, and has four segments connected in a line by hinges that house independent hydraulic power plants. As each segment surges up or down with the crest of an oncoming wave, its hydraulic power plant pumps a biodegradable hydraulic fluid through a turbine which produces up to 0.75 megawatt of electricity per unit. Three of these, constructed at a cost of $13 million are currently producing a total of 2.25 megawatts at peak off the coast of Portugal, and there are plans to eventually expand the wave farm to 21 megawatts.

Greencon

3. World’s Largest Dry Biomass-Fired Power PlantOy Alholmens Kraft in Pietarsaari, Finland

Like most biomass-fired power plants, the Oy Alholmens Kraft power plant relies on locally sourced bark, branches and peat to fuel its enormous boiler—the largest of its kind in the world at 550 megawatts of heat. Burning all that generates a peak output of 240 megawatts of electricity. (The plant also generates 160 megawatts of steam, which is used directly by nearby industry and for district heating.) Both the peat and the wood by-products burned by this plant are harvested sustainably. In the case of the wood, trees equal in amount to those felled are planted every year and are later harvested at maturity. Peat is also continuously generated by decaying plants in wetlands, and although it is produced slowly, it can be harvested sustainably as long as it’s carefully managed.

“We need more than 120 trucks [of biomass] per day,” says Stig Nickul, managing director of the plant. “One truck is enough for six to seven minutes.”

By 2010, Wales will be able to claim a 350-megawatt biomass-fired power plant, but its waste wood feedstock will have to be imported from Canada, making it of questionable renewable value.

Greencon

4. World’s Most Productive Geothermal FieldThe Geysers in Sonoma and Lake Counties, Calif.

Despite having declined from a peak production of 2,000 megawatts in the mid-1980′s to the present value of about 1,000 megawatts, The Geysers remains the most productive geothermal field in the world, providing nearly 60 percent of the electricity used in California’s North Coast region, which stretches from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Oregon border. (The decline is due to depletion of the aquifer from which the plants draw their steam; newer plant designs re-inject the water in order to eliminate this problem.)

The first commercial geothermal power plant in the U.S. was built at The Geysers in 1960; it produced 11 megawatts of power. Individual plants at this location now average about 50 megawatts, but are dwarfed by the largest geothermal power plant currently proposed, which would be built in Sarulla, North Sumatra, Indonesia, by geothermal technology company Ormat and its partners, producing 330 megawatts of electricity at peak.

Greencon
5. World’s Largest Photovoltaic Power Plant

Olmedilla Photovoltaic Park in Olmedilla de Alarcón, Spain

The Olmedilla Photovoltaic (PV) Park uses 162,000 flat solar photovoltaic panels to deliver 60 megawatts of electricity on a sunny day. The entire plant was completed in 15 months at a cost of about $530 million at current exchange rates. Olmedilla was built with conventional solar panels, which are made with silicon and tend to be heavy and expensive. So-called “thin-film” solar panels, although less efficient per square meter, tend to be much cheaper to produce, and they are the technology being tapped to realize the world’s largest proposed PV plant, the Rancho Cielo Solar Farm in Belen, N. Mex., which is expected to cost $840 million, cover an area of 700 acres (285 hectares), and produce 600 megawatts of power.

Greencon
6. World’s Largest Solar Thermal Plant

Solar Energy Generating Systems in Southern California

Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) has been the world record holder for largest solar thermal project since its completion in 1990. SEGS consists of nine separate solar thermal power plants spread across the Mojave Desert, which collectively can produce 354 megawatts of power. They were designed, built and operated by Luz International, which subsequently went bankrupt when the tax breaks that made the plant profitable evaporated. The chairman of Luz is back, however, heading up Brightsource, a new solar thermal energy company that has just signed the two largest contracts for solar thermal electricity in the world. These contracts will be serviced by 14 solar thermal plants with a total output of 2,600 megawatts, to be built between now and 2017. These facilities differ substantially from SEGS, which uses long troughs to collect the sun’s heat; they will consist of thousands of mirrors that will reflect the sun’s energy onto a central heating tower.

“The overarching theme of why we moved from trough to tower is that it’s much more  efficient,” says Keely Wachs, director of communications at BrightSource, who notes that the cost of the tower design is also significantly lower, making it cost-competitive with other sources of energy.

Greencon
7. World’s Largest Tidal Power TurbineSeaGen Turbine in Strangford Lough, Ireland

Like wind turbines, but powered by the flow of water instead of the flow of air, tidal power turbines transform tides or deep ocean currents into electricity. The 1.2-megawatt SeaGen tidal power turbine, which consists of a matched pair of turbines, each up to 66 feet (20 meters) in diameter, is currently the only commercial-scale tidal power turbine in the world. This system costs about $5 million per installed megawatt of capacity, or about 30 percent more than offshore wind power, according to the manufacturer. The blades have the ability to turn 180 degrees in order to spin in either incoming or outgoing tidal currents. The turbines can be raised for ease of maintenance, as depicted in this photo. The inset illustration shows the turbines under normal use.

By 2015, the SeaGen turbine will be surpassed by a massive tidal power turbine project in the Wando Hoenggan Waterway off the coast of South Korea, to be built jointly by Lunar Energy and Korean Midland Power Company for $820 million. Generating 300 megawatts of capacity, the 300 one-megawatt, 60-foot- (18-meter-) high turbines will be anchored to the seabed by their own weight.

Greencon
9. World’s Largest Tidal Power Barrage

Rance Tidal Barrage in Bretagne, France

Many of the world’s largest renewable projects have been around for quite some time: Completed in 1967 at a cost of approximately $134 million, the Rance tidal barrage (dam) is the world’s first, and remains the world’s largest, power plant that produces electricity from tides. The Rance barrage works by blocking the entrance to the estuary of the Rance River, where average difference between low and high tides is 26 feet (eight meters). The 24 10-megawatt bulb turbines that sit in the barrage beneath the surface can be turned by the water as it flows both into and out of the estuary, allowing the dam to produce electricity almost continuously.

In the future, the U.K. has proposed a tidal power barrage across the Severn Estuary that separates England and Wales. Whereas a number of different barrages have been proposed, the largest would be a 7.4-mile- (12-kilometer-) long dam that could produce 8.6 gigawatts of energy, or 5 percent of the electricity currently used in  the U.K.

Greencon
10. World’s Biggest Offshore Wind Farm

Lynn and Inner Dowsing Wind Farm Near Skegness, Lincolnshire, England

Visible from the beach of Skegness, England, the 54 3.6-megawatt turbines of the Lynn and Inner Dowsing offshore wind farm collectively can produce up to 194 megawatts of electricity at peak. Each turbine is 353 feet (107 meters) in diameter and turns on a hub that is 265 feet (80 meters) above sea level. Every turbine sits on a pylon that was driven into the shallow seabed by the Resolution, a vessel purposely built for the installation of offshore wind farms. (It extends six legs into the seabed to stabilize itself before installation of the pylon on which each turbine sits.) The total cost of the project was nearly $500 million.

By the end of 2009, Lynn and Inner Dowsing will have been superseded by the 209-megawatt Horns Rev 2 wind farm sited in the North Sea between 19 and 25 miles (30 and 40 kilometers) west of the westernmost tip of Denmark, which will cost about $670 million. And the 1,000-megawatt London Array in the outer Thames Estuary is projected to be completed in 2012.

Greencon

11. World’s Biggest On-Shore Wind FarmHorse Hollow Wind Energy Center in Taylor and Nolan Counties, Tex.

About 100 miles (160 kilometers) west of Dallas, 47,000 acres (19,000 hectares) of Texas cedar and scrub oak have been given over to the 421 wind turbines that comprise the Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center. The 291 1.5-megawatt turbines built by GE and the 130 2.3-megawatt wind turbines built by Siemens together deliver 735 megawatts of peak power. The farm was completed in 2006 and is operated by NextEra Energy, a subsidiary of Florida Power & Light, which operates wind facilities that deliver over four gigawatts of power across the U.S.

Horse Hollow won’t retain the crown for long, however: By the middle of 2009, E.ON Climate and Renewables will complete the fourth phase of the Roscoe Wind Farm in Texas, which will deliver 781.5 megawatts from 627 turbines.

Other giant wind farms that have been announced include the Shepherd’s Flat Wind Farm in Oregon (800 megawatts, 303 wind turbines) and a wind farm in Markbygden, Sweden, (four gigawatts, 1,101 wind turbines).

Source: Scientific American On-Line

Keep it Green

Greencon

Greencon
1. WORLD HEADQUARTERS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE–YARMOUTH PORT, MASS.

Building green can often mean breaking the bank. But the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) was able to build their world headquarters in Cape Cod for about $220 per square foot. Resting on what used to be a brownfield site, the new building restored green space to the area and filled it with native plants. In order to cut down on operating costs, Boston-based designLAB Architects situated the nonprofit’s buildings so as to increase ventilation and natural daylight. The organization’s 200 employees helped to design the workspace plans to improve efficiency while also cutting down on square footage per person by about half.

Greencon
2. THE TERRY THOMAS–SEATTLE, WASH.

When surveyed about what they hoped to get in a new office space, workers of the architecture firm that was one of the building’s first tenants asked for more natural light, improved ventilation and better open spaces. So the Weber Thompson firm in Seattle set out to bring all of these wishes to fruition, along with assuring that the building would stay in good financial standing to attract future rentals. (The total project cost came out to about $9.7 million.) The building also sits along a new streetcar line and includes showers for workers who opt to bike to work.

Greencon
3. SYNERGY AT DOCKSIDE GREEN–VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA

Residents of Synergy, the first of a four-phase development project in Victoria, British Columbia, live in a carbon-neutral building. They water their rooftop veggie gardens and flush their toilets with rainwater and can control rolling canopies to cut down on unwanted solar heat. An on-site heat and power plant hooks up with hydropower to supply electricity to the building, and it buys renewable offset credits to make up for the rest of the power. Vancouver-based Busby Perkins+Will Architects selected quick-to-regrow materials, including bamboo and cork, to finish off interiors.

Greencon
4. SHANGRI LA BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NATURE CENTER–ORANGE, TEX.

Rather than draw attention to themselves, the structures at the Shangri La Botanical Gardens are there to bring visitors out into the 252-acre (100-hectare) preserve to showcase the surroundings—without disturbing them. Just as construction began in 2005, Hurricane Rita swept through the area, felling trees in the swamp and forests. Lake|Flato Architects in San Antonio were able to use many of the fallen tress in the new buildings. The center, which reopened the area to the public for the first time since the 1950s, was the first LEED Platinum–certified new construction in Texas.

Greencon
5. PORTOLA VALLEY TOWN CENTER–PORTOLA VALLEY, CALIF.

Perched on the San Andreas Fault, Portola Valley wanted to replace its old town hall, community hall and library with buildings that would be safer, hold improved meeting space and be more environmentally friendly. Town residents and a special task force worked with Emeryville, Calif., architectural firms Siegel & Strain and Goring & Straja to build a town center for about $15 million that reused beams, paneling and fill from the old buildings as well as local eucalyptus flooring. A solar electricity system can crank out 40 percent of the center’s power needs, and they’re in the process of turning a nearby abandoned culvert into a cistern that will be able to store 40,000 gallons (150,000 liters) of rainwater.

Greencon

6. JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION–EVANSTON, ILL.

This eco-sensitive synagogue was built to honor the Hebrew principle of tikkun olam, which means “repairing the world”. To achieve that end Chicago’s Ross Barney Architects firm began by considering storm water. They optimized usable space inside to decrease runoff, allowing for a smaller building footprint and more open green space to collect storm water.

The multipurpose religious, educational and community center also boasts green building materials, including reclaimed cypress wood, gabion walls filled with waste masonry (which help regulate temperature) and paints and finishes with low VOCs (volatile organic compounds).

Greencon
7. GREAT RIVER ENERGY HQ–MAPLE GROVE, MINN.

It might be fitting for a nonprofit energy cooperative to be hyperconscious of its power consumption. With its new building, Great River Energy (GRE) became the most electrically energy-efficient building in Minnesota. GRE aims to be a model for its consumers to reduce energy use. The structure, whose total project cost came in at about $57 million, sits at the end of a main road in suburban Maple Grove and uses sunlight—from atria—to light work spaces for most all of its 425 workers. A nearby urban wind turbine helps in the headquarters’s 75 percent decrease in fossil fuel use.

Greencon
8. GISH APARTMENTS–SAN JOSE, CALIF.

A building’s environmental impact doesn’t have to stop at its threshold. That’s why the Gish Apartments are steps from a local light rail and have a convenience store downstairs, so residents don’t have to jump in their cars to pick up that gallon of milk or get to work.

To turn a San Jose brownfield into mixed housing for low-income and special-needs families, First Community Housing, a local affordable housing organization, turned to locally based OJK Architecture and Planning to create the 35-unit structure. Although some of the building materials—such as double-glazed windows and rooftop solar panels—were pricier to purchase at the outset, they’re already being offset by cheaper operational costs.

Greencon 9. CHARTWELL SCHOOL–SEASIDE, CALIF.

Massive windows help to provide learning disabled students at the LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design)–certified Chartwell with a healthy, soothing and airy learning environment. The windows, along with strategic solar panel placement and radiant heat, are moving the school—designed by San Francisco–based EHDD Architecture—toward its goal of zero net energy use. The school hopes that the model of sustainability will also be a life lesson for students. “Improved academic outcomes and responsible resource stewardship build on each other,” Chartwell’s executive director, Douglas Atkins, said in a statement.

 

 

Greencon10. CHARLES W. HOSTLER STUDENT CENTER–BEIRUT, LEBANON

Rather than creating a single massive building to hold athletic and meeting facilities for the American University of Beirut, the Minneapolis-based VJAA firm developed this diverse complex on the shore of the Mediterranean. The construction kept original trees to provide shade for buildings and outdoor spaces, and is oriented on an east-west axis to reduce the amount of hot southern exposure. The student center also makes use of the landscape, gently bringing pedestrians—and the eye—down the slope to the sea, which it capitalizes on for cool nighttime ventilation breezes.

Keep it Green 

Greencon