Archive for November, 2008

Any followers or our newsletter and blog site would know that we have been stating for a long time that the only possible survival for renewable energy in this country is through the increase in the price of power. Our power prices are disproportionately cheap. Eskom can see with the advent of maintenance and expansion needed to keep up with development goals, new power stations cost a massive amount of dollars to build. They no longer can rely on cheap coal and labour, and all other commodities needed for running a power station are bought on the international market at international prices. That is why i say the best rout for change is in restructuring cost, read this from Fin24:

“Power prices to triple – 2008/11/21

Vereeniging – The cost of electricity in South Africa is likely to triple over the next decade as Eskom needs to invest heavily in alternative sources of energy with a view to climate change.

So says the power utility, South Africa’s biggest polluter, in a report forming part of the National Business Initiatives’ Carbon Disclosure Project.

It was a willing participant in the project, and its report was attached to that of the top 100 companies (listed on the JSE) that were involved this year. One of the biggest threats to power generation in the short to medium and long-term, it says, is the availability of water.

Eskom is busy implementing short-term measures to save water through dry cooling, but the process in fact releases more greenhouse gases.

Cheap electricity has gone for ever, says the company.

“In the past Eskom generated the cheapest electricity in the world, and now the company is struggling with capacity problems, especially in regard to the supply [of coal] because of, into alia, the tremendous economic growth South Africa has experienced over the past ten years.

“We therefore expect the price of electricity to triple in the coming decade.”

Eskom reckons that it is necessary to have a greater variety in its energy mix, which will also help reduce its carbon footprint.

Renewable energy sources that Eskom is currently considering include wind, solar energy, ocean currents, biomass and hydroelectricity. Eskom’s wind and solar projects are the most advanced at this stage. The introduction of clean technology for the burning of coal forms part of the construction plans for Eskom’s new power stations.

The electricity giant says the greenhouse gases it released into the atmosphere this year amounted to 223.6 metric tonnes, compared to 208.9 last year.

Incite Sustainability, the compiler of the report, points out that Eskom’s carbon footprint is almost three times that of South Africa’s second-biggest polluter, Sasol”

Keep it Green

Greencon

Reduce your dependence on Grid power, a message from your concerned Greencon agent:

The Herald Newspaper Today:

“ESKOM has warned of possible load-shedding countrywide as a result of high temperatures that have resulted in increased use of air conditioners.

This follows a warning from the municipality yesterday that Nelson Mandela Bay residents could experience power outages. Municipal spokesman Lourens Schoeman said Eskom had warned there was a possibility of load- shedding yesterday.

“They have lost Koeberg 1 and the three 600MV.A generators at Matla due to leaking boiler tubes. All this is unplanned and all customers are requested to conserve energy where possible to reduce the chances of load-shedding.”

Schoeman said he did not know which areas would be affected. An announcement would be made about this. “They have not told us when exactly load-shedding will take place, but they warned that it could happen.”

Eskom national spokesman Fani Zulu confirmed that there was a chance of a power cut, saying the system was tighter than usual due to high temperatures.

“There was an increased use of air conditioners. As a result we are seeing an increase in demand at a time when we are doing maintenance. A number of generators are not available.”

Zulu said everything possible was being done to avoid load-shedding. There were indications that this was successful.

“We will assess the situation (today). There might be a few generators back to relieve the stress in the system.”

Earlier in the year the country was hit by widespread power cuts.

Load-shedding in January forced large gold and platinum mines to stop operating, resulting in a sharp drop in economic growth.

Mandela Bay was also subjected to load-shedding for up to 4½ hours a day, three times a week. Load-shedding was later suspended as a result of reduced demand.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

 

 

 

Trends in the US and Europe seem to be pointing towards greater awareness in Building built on a more sustainable methodology. Read this report from “Build Design and Construction Magazine” :

“BOSTON, Greenbuild Expo, November 19, 2008Autodesk, Inc. and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) have announced the results of the 2008 Autodesk/AIA Green Index, an annual survey that measures how AIA members are practicing sustainable design, as well as their opinions about the green building movement. This year’s index shows an increase in the implementation of sustainable design practices from architects and building owners. In addition, it shows that architects’ clients have experienced a doubling in the market demand for green buildings over the past year as well as positive shifts in architects’ attitudes toward their ability to impact climate change.
A major finding of the 2008 Green Index was that 42 percent of architects report clients asking for green building elements on a majority of their projects, with 47 percent of clients actually implementing green building elements on their projects, an increase of 15 percent from 2007. Client demand remains the leading driver for green building, with 66 percent of surveyed architects citing client demand as the primary influence on their practice of green building. Architects believe that the primary reasons their clients are asking for green buildings are reduced operating costs (60 percent), marketing (52 percent) and market demand (21 percent, up from 10 percent in the 2007 survey). The full Autodesk/AIA Green Index report is available at http://www.autodesk.com/green.
“We are encouraged to see the continued rise in demand for green buildings, and that architects are responding to this demand by increasing their practice of sustainable design, said Jay Bhatt, senior vice president, Autodesk AEC Solutions. “Autodesk is committed to developing software that makes sustainable design easier and more efficient, and it is rewarding to learn through this survey that 41 percent of architects are using software to help predict and evaluate the environmental impact and lifecycle of their buildings.”
In response to the rising client demand for green buildings, architects are increasing their use of certain sustainable design practices. According to the survey, 34 percent of architects are now implementing green or vegetated roof coverings on more than half of their new projects, compared with 7 percent of architects in 2007. Also, 39 percent are using renewable, on-site energy sources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, low-impact hydro, biomass or bio-gas on over half of new building designs, compared with just 6 percent last year. Architects indicated a significant increase in their use of design software over the past year to help predict and evaluate HVAC operating costs (39 percent, up from 31 percent in 2007), conduct energy modeling and baseline analysis (33 percent, up from 29 percent in 2007) and evaluate and explore alternative building materials (35 percent, up from 20 percent in 2007).
“The results of the Autodesk/AIA Green Index survey are encouraging because it shows that clients and the market are realizing the bottom-line benefits of sustainable design,” said Christine McEntee, EVP and CEO of the AIA. “The AIA will be adding to our various resources to help accelerate the adoption of sustainable design principles by both clients and design professionals, and advocating at the local, state and federal level for energy-efficient buildings will continue to be our main legislative priority.”
Positive Attitudes about Sustainable Practice
The 2008 Autodesk/AIA Green Index found that 89 percent of architects believe sustainable design should be practiced whenever possible, up three percentage points from 2007. Over seven in 10 architects (71 percent compared with 67 percent in 2007) agree that when thinking about architecture and the environment, they feel the profession is headed in the right direction. Fifty-seven percent of respondents indicated that their organization is starting to implement standard operating procedures to inform clients about green building, up from 49 percent in 2007.
U.S. Architects Aligned with European and Asian Peers in Green Design
Over the past year, Autodesk also conducted similar green index surveys of architects in Japan, Italy and the United Kingdom, in partnership with organizations including the Japan Institute of Architects and the Royal Institute of British Architects. When asked why their clients were interested in green building, architects in all countries agreed that it was due to the desire for reduced operating costs. AIA members lead their global counterparts in the belief that architects should practice sustainable design whenever possible, with 89 percent of architects in the United States agreeing, followed by 88 percent in the United Kingdom, 73 percent in Italy and 59 percent in Japan. However, the reasons architects are building green vary across countries. In the United States green building designs are driven by client demand (66 percent), whereas in the United Kingdom and Japan the primary factors are regulatory requirements (75 percent and 64 percent respectively) and in Italy, rising energy costs (70 percent). “
Keep it Green

In discussing the value of making a change to better alternatives with customers and interested parties, i often quote the findings of the Stern Report. This is more often than not met with a strange twisted look in the face of the person caught in discussion. This report was commissioned back in 2005 by then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown.

The British government was trying to get to the bottom of what the cost of moving towards a more environmentally safe and sustainable planet would actually cost. For this Lord Stern was commissioned. The result was a 700 page document that really brought the severity of our circumstances to bare. Here is a highlighted version from the Guardian Newspaper.

“Stern report: the key points

The dangers

· All countries will be affected by climate change, but the poorest countries will suffer earliest and most.

· Average temperatures could rise by 5C from pre-industrial levels if climate change goes unchecked.

· Warming of 3 or 4C will result in many millions more people being flooded. By the middle of the century 200 million may be permanently displaced due to rising sea levels, heavier floods and drought.

· Warming of 4C or more is likely to seriously affect global food production.

· Warming of 2C could leave 15-40% species facing extinction.

· Before the industrial revolution level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere was 280 parts per million (ppm) CO2 equivalent (CO2e); the current level is 430ppm CO2e. The level should be limited to 450-550ppm CO2.

· Anything higher would substantially increase risks of very harmful impacts. Anything lower would impose very high adjustment costs in the near term and might not even be feasible.

· Deforestation is responsible for more emissions than the transport sector.

· Climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen.

Recommended actions

· Three elements of policy are required for an effective response: carbon pricing, technology policy and energy efficiency.

· Carbon pricing, through taxation, emissions trading or regulation, will show people the full social costs of their actions. The aim should be a global carbon price across countries and sectors.

· Emissions trading schemes, like that operating across the EU, should be expanded and linked.

· Technology policy should drive the large-scale development and use of a range of low-carbon and high-efficiency products.

· Globally, support for energy research and development should at least double; support for the deployment of low-carbon technologies should be increased my up to five times.

· International product standards could be introduced.

· Large-scale international pilot programmes to explore the best ways to curb deforestation should be started very quickly.

· Climate change should be fully integrated into development policy, and rich countries should honour pledges to increase support through overseas development assistance.

· International funding should support improved regional information on climate change impacts.

· International funding should go into researching new crop varieties that will be more resilient to drought and flood.

Economic impacts

· The benefits of strong, early action considerably outweigh the costs.

· Unabated climate change could cost the world at least 5% of GDP each year; if more dramatic predictions come to pass, the cost could be more than 20% of GDP.

· The cost of reducing emissions could be limited to around 1% of global GDP; people could be charged more for carbon-intensive goods.

· Each tonne of CO2 we emit causes damages worth at least $85, but emissions can be cut at a cost of less than $25 a tonne.

· Shifting the world onto a low-carbon path could eventually benefit the economy by $2.5 trillion a year.

· By 2050, markets for low-carbon technologies could be worth at least $500bn.

· What we do now can have only a limited effect on the climate over the next 40 or 50 years, but what we do in the next 10-20 years can have a profound effect on the climate in the second half of this century.”

Although some Economists have attacked the models used to come up with the percentage values needed, there is little argument that the spend is neccessary and vital to ensure a planet worth leaving for our children.

Keep it Green

Greencon

As Eco “:Greenies” we at Greencon originally became interested in the environment through growing concerns with water security and safety in South Africa. Being one of the driest places on earth coupled with the impact of global warming, the very serious disappearance of our most precious resource was for us a great motivator to help provide water purifying and recycling products. Read the following article from the Business Day;

“THE controversial suspension of researcher Anthony Turton from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) over his damning report on the quality of our drinking water has brought the subject of water safety to the fore of public debate again.

Turton — a political scientist and researcher in the field of water resource management — was suspended from the CSIR last week after being prevented from presenting a paper in which he concludes that “we are heading for a significant crisis in the water sector”.

That crisis was likely to fan social instability and constrain future economic development, he said.

His alarm on the looming water crisis follows similar warnings earlier this year by other water resource management experts, which drew vehement denials in Parliament from Water Affairs and Forestry Minister Lindiwe Hendricks.

The experts said then that SA’s strained water supply system was putting the health of millions at risk, and warned that a crisis similar to that in electricity supply would develop if no immediate steps were taken to preserve water quality.

One of the central arguments in Turton’s planned presentation to a CSIR conference last week was that SA faced a water crisis both because of declining water infrastructure and because of a lack of skilled personnel.

In his paper, circulated internally at the CSIR weeks before the conference, Turton says the government must either accept that the development targets of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for SA are unattainable, or must launch a radical rethink of how to mobilise SA’s science, engineering and technological capacity.

“After all, the Uhuru Decade came to an end with the electricity crisis in early 2008. This Uhuru Decade has been manifest all across Africa when a liberation movement has inherited infrastructure that works for about 10 years before starting to break down through lack of investment in operation, maintenance and skilled human capacity,” Turton says.

“In SA’s case that infrastructure was particularly robust, so it has lasted a decade and a half, but it is now clearly under pressure and if left alone will collapse piece by piece, in the mid-term future.”

The trend in infrastructure investment for water at the national level shows this prognosis to be probable in a startling way, he says.

To illustrate this point, Turton says a significant proportion of SA’s municipalities have no civil engineering professional support, with rural areas affected the most.

“It is precisely these rural areas that are most likely to be affected by the deteriorating water quality arising from eutrophication in rivers and dams. It is also these local authorities that are the least capable of adapting water treatment processes and plant to remove microcystins, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and antiretroviral medication (ARVs) that are likely to arise from a population with a heavy burden of AIDS-related diseases,” he says.

Turton says SA has failed to mobilise what previous scholars have described as “social ingenuity” — a necessary precondition for “technical ingenuity” — the capacity of a nation to develop solutions to problems driven by external change.

He reiterates the widely held view that SA is failing to produce enough engineers to plug the skills gap and says that lack of investment in water research since 1985 means SA is now “flying blind as a nation”.

There was also an urgent need for a study of people living near mines to determine the effect of chronic exposure to heavy metals, he says. “This will be complex and costly, but we need such a study as a matter of national emergency.”

Turton’s comments about the supply and safety of SA’s drinking water echo concerns that have been raised in recent years.

These worries have been heightened by recent outbreaks of disease that have left thousands sick and scores dead after drinking contaminated water.

These deaths, especially those of 83 babies in the Eastern Cape earlier this year, are directly attributed to the shortage of skilled personnel to manage the water supply.

The dire shortage of technical skills in municipalities, which are critical to the delivery of healthy water to millions of consumers, especially in poorer areas, has also been acknowledged by the water affairs and forestry department.

Engineers and technicians are instrumental in the construction, maintenance and repair of water infrastructure, as well as the treatment of water.

According to the CSIR, Dr Turton has 19 years’ experience of strategic planning and risk assessment in areas of contestation, including negotiations that ended complex and protracted periods of conflict.

Included in this were the negotiations that led to the South African withdrawal from Angola; the implementation of UN Resolution 435 and the independence of Namibia; the secret negotiations that led to the release of political prisoners and the Codesa constitutional talks; and the secret diplomatic negotiations that ended Mozambique’s civil war.

Turton has a PhD in the hydropolitics of SA, has written extensively on water resource management and has a specialist interest in governance.

He serves on the editorial board of the International Journal of Water Resources Development and is an invited speaker to major international events.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

When you listen to the experts out there, and hear about the massive projective costs of climate change, it enough to drive you into a perminant state of depression. I picked up this article from an IT blog. Serves as motivation for all of us to get people to change as quick as possible.

From IT_Weekly,
The effects of climate change pose serious social, economic and environmental threats to the world today, with more than 200-million people expected to be displaced due to rising sea levels over the next 50 years.

In addition, 15%-40% of the Earth’s species face extinction, and the malaria death toll will be greatly increased due to the expansion of the tropics.
“Extreme weather events are becoming increasingly frequent, wreaking havoc and destruction, costing companies and countries billions of dollars”, says Kevin James, CEO of Global Carbon Exchange, a South African/Australasian-based carbon and energy reduction consultancy.
A study conducted by a Deutche Bank economist states that “forest decline could be costing about 7% of global GDP”. This translates to staggering global losses of between $2-triller and $5-trillion per year, losses we can ill afford in the current economic market.
For businesses, addressing climate change is becoming increasingly important and the risks of inaction could have far reaching and dire effects on traditional business models. The introduction of carbon tax based on a company’s CO2 emissions could “soon” be implemented according to Environmental Affairs and Tourism Minister, Martinus Van Schalkwyk, when addressing cabinet in late July.
“This would immediately create a liability on a company’s balance sheet that just wasn’t there before. Forward thinking companies have identified this as a risk to their future commercial sustainability and are taking action to at least know where they stand,” adds James.
In addition, the cost of energy on individuals and corporations is also a growing financial burden. One of Eskom’s proposed policies is to penalise consumers across the board should they not reach sector-specific energy reduction targets. The reductions necessary would be 5% for agriculture, 10% for commercial and household consumption, 15% for the industrial sector and 20% for hotels and shopping malls. So, as stated in The Stern Review, it is clear that “the earlier action is taken, the less costly it will be”.
A growing number of South African companies are taking action and enjoying savings by utilising the services of climate change and carbon reduction consultancies.
There are four steps companies should take to reduce their impact on climate change and maximize their energy efficiency, advises James.
The first step is determining a carbon footprint, which quantifies the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases a company emits per annum or per product.
This is followed by an investment detailed financial energy audit, which pinpoints exactly where and how much energy is being used in the company’s operations. This information is then used to implement reductions which maximise energy efficiency and lead to massive cost and emissions savings.
Comprehensive staff-education and awareness programmes often lead to the greatest energy reductions in this step. Companies should ensure that the vendor they select offers this crucial service.
Finally, should any emissions remain, there are a number of community-driven carbon reduction and offset projects available in which to invest, which also enhance a company’s social investment and reputation.
“Taking action on climate change has a strong moral appeal to consumers and this translates into extremely valuable marketing and branding opportunities for companies,” says James.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

Coal industry ‘pensive’ about Obama. The should be, considering the amount of pollution they contribute to the environment. The simple truth is that whether you change technologies or you “clean-up” existing ones, there is no way to do it without significantly increasing the amount that electricity costs. So keep making the change to products that use the sun or wind to create power and become as independent as possible.

by Jim Suhr, Associated Press, St. Louis, Mo. 

“Bill Raney considers coal golden. After all, the black rock fuels half of the nation’s electrical generation.

But the West Virginia Coal Association’s president and others in the industry say they’ve received mixed messages about president-elect Barack Obama’s support for coal-fired power.

Obama and vice president-elect Joe Biden both have said they support finding cleaner ways to burn coal. But during the campaign, Obama told a newspaper that electricity rates could soar under his energy plan, while Biden told a voter in Ohio that “we’re not supporting clean coal” — though he has said the U.S. should develop clean coal technology and export it to China.

“I think there’s a great deal of pensiveness,” Raney said.

Others, including Obama’s camp, say they see little reason to worry.

Obama comes from Illinois, a coal-producing state, and supported its bid for the FutureGen experimental coal-fired power plant that would store emissions of carbon dioxide — a heat-trapping gas blamed for global warming — underground. After the plant was awarded to Mattoon, Ill., the Bush administration and the U.S. Energy Department walked away, citing costs that had ballooned to $1.8 billion.

Some key Democrats are from coal states. Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin is the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat. Ed Rendell, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, is governor of Pennsylvania, a big coal producer and home to steel mills that rely on the ore.

“All of these people who are some of the strongest supporters of coal in the U.S. Congress and in the governor’s office … have supported and worked hard for President-elect Obama,” said Cecil Roberts, president of United Mine Workers, which endorsed Obama last spring. “And I don’t think he’s going to let those folks down.”

Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, a trade group that includes many of the nation’s biggest mining-equipment makers, said he believes Obama will be pragmatic about the need to keep coal in the nation’s energy mix.

“He presumably would be sensitive to the impacts of energy policies on the economy given the perilous state of the economy,” Popovich said. “And he’s certainly shown an exceptional ability to listen to and to hear what voters want, and what we think voters said they wanted was practical solutions.”
Obama has said he recognizes coal’s importance in powering the U.S., but achieving his ambitious emissions-cutting objectives hinges on finding more environmentally friendly ways of using coal to generate electricity. He has said his goal is to create five first-of-a-kind, coal-fired demonstration plants that would capture carbon emissions and store them underground “so they’re not adding to global warming.”

The president plays a pivotal role in shaping the nation’s energy policy, naming top officials at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. And on Capitol Hill, Democrats have padded their majorities in both chambers.

“So when the music stops, who will be chairing the various committees with jurisdictions over coal? That will also be critical,” Popovich said.
Some of that jockeying on Capitol Hill already is under way.

Democrats on Thursday steered the House toward more aggressively tackling global warming and other environmental problems, tapping California liberal Henry Waxman to head the House’s Energy and Commerce panel.

An avid environmentalist and booster of health care programs, Waxman replaces Michigan Rep. John Dingell, an old-school supporter of Detroit’s carmakers and other big industries such as electric utilities. Waxman is expected to move legislation with tougher emissions standards than Dingell would have.

Well before Thursday, Waxman and other powerful Washington voices, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, lined up against coal-fired power, which churns out two billions tons of greenhouse gases annually. Waxman this year signed onto legislation that would ban any new coal-fired power plants built without technology to capture carbon dioxide.

Yet uncertainty lingers, often tied to Obama’s statement to the San Francisco Chronicle’s editorial board in January that his proposed cap-and-trade system to control greenhouse gases — which would set an overall emissions limit, then require polluters to buy allowances at public auction — would be “as aggressive if not more aggressive than anybody else’s out there.”

He also told the newspaper that electricity rates would increase, and coal-fired plants that did not reduce pollution could go bankrupt because of the costs of buying pollution allowances.

Obama’s energy plan includes mandatory reductions of greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. He also proposed a 10-year $150 billion fund for biofuels, wind, solar, plug-in hybrids, clean-coal technology and other “climate-friendly” measures, and would require utilities to produce 25 percent of power from renewable energy by 2025.

At St. Louis-based Peabody Energy, among the world’s biggest coal producers, spokesman Vic Svec said “there is obvious cause for alarm when political leaders acknowledge that under onerous cap-and-trade bills that limit coal use, ‘electricity costs would skyrocket.’”

But Svec notes that Obama’s comments to the San Francisco newspaper are nearly a year old, and that since then Obama dozens of times has voiced growing support for clean-coal technologies — including FutureGen, the project that includes Peabody as a potential partner.

“This may seem counterintuitive, but we are eager for the new administration in terms of their support for coal and their support for advancement of carbon capture and storage technology,” said Svec, whose company fuels roughly one-tenth of all U.S. electricity generation and more than 2 percent worldwide.

Popovich, from the mining trade group, said he suspects that the faltering U.S. economy will make Obama reluctant to mess with “indispensable” King Coal.

“I would say there’s some cautious — underscore cautious — optimism,” he said. “You’re not going to help the American economy by hurting coal production and coal utilization.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

 

“A Palo Alto start-up with powerful backing on Thursday unveiled an ambitious $1 billion plan to help make the Bay Area the nation’s electric-car capital.

 

Endorsed by all three of the Bay Area’s big city mayors, the plan would provide the re-charging infrastructure that must be in place before most consumers would consider buying or leasing an electric car.

Better Place, headed by former high-tech executive Shai Agassi, plans to install about 250,000 charging ports, 200 battery-exchange stations and a control center to service Bay Area electric car drivers. The goal is to have most of the system in place by 2012.

“We need to put together a new industry, and it needs to scale very fast,” Agassi said at a press conference in San Francisco. He was flanked by San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed as well as Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Agassi’s business plan is to distribute electric vehicles much the way telecoms distribute cell-phones. Customers will subscribe to drive a certain number of miles and get an electric vehicle at a discounted price. Better Place will own the battery.

“We buy batteries and clean electricity and we sell miles,” he said.

Better Place already has struck deals in Israel, Denmark and Australia to build battery-charging electrical outlets and stations where drained batteries can be quickly swapped for fully-charged ones. The Bay Area would be the first U.S. deployment of itstechnology.

The mayors offered no money but committed to a nine-point plan that includes regional standards for expedited permitting and installation of charging outlets in homes, at businesses and in public parking spaces. It also offers incentives to companies that install electric-vehicle chargers, and sets unspecified goals for electric-vehicle purchases for government fleets.

“We’re certainly not going to build cars, but we somehow have to get the infrastructure to refuel them,” Reed said . “And we can’t wait 100 years for the gas-station model to evolve.”

Agassi, a one-time vice president of business software giant SAP, has raised $200 million in venture capital since founding Better Place in 2007. He said he has backing from Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Australia’s Macquarie Capital Group, did not plan to ask the cities for money.

In some of the previously announced deals, Better Place is working with Renault-Nissan to supply electric cars. While the auto maker didn’t take part in Thursday’s announcement, an electric version of the Nissan Rogue sport-utility vehicle was on display outside City Hall.

For the Bay Area, Better Place envisions a broad range of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, from General Motors, Toyota, Silicon Valley electric-car startup Tesla Motors and others.

Research released Thursday indicates that 100,000 electric cars would have “a moderate effect” on the California electric grid. The Global Venture Lab at the University of California, Berkeley, says two decades of “significant adoption” of electric cars here would lead to $175 billion in savings at the gas pump and result in a $120 billion boon for the battery industry.

With large-scaled deployment, electric cars will cost $7,000 less than comparable gasoline cars, according to the lab.

Silicon Valley already has a growing electric-car industry. Tesla Motors began delivering its $109,000 electric Roadster model earlier this year, and plans to build a factory in San Jose.

And Think, a Norwegian maker of small electric cars, has opened an office in Menlo Park with plans to distribute vehicles in the United States. Think North America is backed by local venture-capital heavyweight Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

In a related development Thursday, Coulomb Technologies of Campbell said it would begin installing charging stations for electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids starting next month. Five of those will be located in downtown San Jose, said Richard Lowenthal, chief executive of Coulomb. The company already has orders to install 940 of its wireless Smartlet Networked Charging Stations in 2009 throughout California, he said.”

Keep it Green

Greencon

Governments, not least of all ours, need to be far more aggressive in there attempt to get people to change there energy consumption habits. Reports from all over consistently point to increased carbon production and worsening climate conditions.

“Time is running out in the fight against global warming, the United Nations’ top climate change official warned as a new round of UN talks got under way on Thursday.

“There is little time left to get a solid negotiating text on the table. Clearly the clock is ticking,” said Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.“People in a burning house cannot afford to lose time in an argument,” he said, citing an Ashanti proverb.

The Accra gathering must strive to “reach agreement on the rules and tools” that developed countries will use to cut greenhouse gas emissions, he told more than 1 600 delegates from 160 nations.

Ghana‘s President John Kufuor echoed the sense of urgency in his opening remarks, noting that his country was already suffering the consequences of global warming.

Rainfall in Ghana has decreased by 20% in three decades, and 1 000 square kilometres of fertile agricultural land in the upper Volta Delta will be lost to rising sea levels and flooding if temperatures rise at their current pace, he said.

The expert-level meeting, which runs until August 27, is the third UN climate change conference since nations committed to adopting a binding climate accord no later than December 2009.

It is the last meeting ahead of a ministerial summit in Poznan, Poland, in December where rich countries will be under intense pressure to nail down near-term commitments for reducing greenhouse gases.

The Group of Eight industrialised powers pledged to halve emissions by 2050, but critics say intermediate goals are needed.

 

“The real political commitment is short- and medium-term,” Connie Hedegaard, the Danish Minister for Climate and Energy, told delegates.

“We have to speed up the pace. The negotiations here in Accra must deliver concrete results” about what technologies will be used to cut emissions, she said.

Africa is arguably the continent most vulnerable to the potential ravages of climate change, which range from extreme drought to violent storms to rising sea levels.

De Boer challenged delegates to be “ambitious”, and said if they failed Africa would continue, in terms of climate change, to be the “forgotten continent”.

He insisted that rich countries step up financial assistance to help Africa with global warming.

African produces the fewest emissions, he pointed out, but will likely well pay the heaviest price.

De Boer and Kufuor underlined the threat ofdeforestation, which is destroying one of nature’s most powerful natural buffers against global warming.

The world’s forests — which are disappearing at a rate of about 30-million hectares per year — soak up more than 20% of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

“Governments need to focus on reducing emissions caused by deforestation and forest degradation,” and on how to reward countries that protect forests, said de Boer.

The problem is particularly acute in Amazonia, central Africa and Indonesia, experts note.

WWF, an environmental group, called on the
Accra meeting to adopt the Olympic motto of “faster, higher, stronger”.

“Progress on substance … must be swifter, the level of ambition by both developed and developing countries higher, and the measures to reduce CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions stronger,” said Kim Carstensen,
director of the WWF’s Global Climate Change Initiative. – AFP”

Keep it Green

Greencon

 

 

“Johannesburg – Eskom has signed an export credit financing loan agreement with German bank KfW-IPEX for approximately R2.8bn, the power utility said on Wednesday.
The agreement was signed by finance director Bongani Nqwababa and KfW-IPEX Bank’s first vice president, Peter Purkl in Johannesburg.

The loan would be used to partially finance the six boilers that the Hitachi Power consortium would supply for the new Medupi Power Station in Lephalale.

The loan is repayable over 12 years after the commissioning of Medupi.

Speaking at the signing ceremony, Nqwababa said Eskom’s partnership with KfW-IPEX was important in ensuring that Eskom continued to secure and stabilise the South African power system

Source: Fin24″

Do the math. Simply put we will be paying through higher energy costs. Make the right choice and move away from the grid.

Keep it Green

Greencon